Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Conflict Minerals

The Price of Precious

The minerals in our electronic devices have bankrolled unspeakable violence in the Congo.


National Geographic Magazine, October 2013
By Jeffrey Gettleman
Photography by Marcus Bleasdale

The first child soldier pops out of the bush clutching an AK-47 assault rifle in one hand and a handful of fresh marijuana buds in the other. The kid, probably 14 or 15, has this big, goofy, mischievous grin on his face, like he’s just stolen something—which he probably has—and he’s wearing a ladies’ wig with fake braids dangling down to his shoulders. Within seconds his posse materializes from the thick, green leaves all around us, about ten other heavily armed youngsters dressed in ratty camouflage and filthy T-shirts, dropping down from the sides of the jungle and blocking the red dirt road in front of us. Our little Toyota truck is suddenly swarmed and immobilized by a four-and-a-half-foot-tall army.

This is on the road to Bavi, a rebel-controlled gold mine on the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s wild eastern edge. Congo is sub-Saharan Africa’s largest country and one of its richest on paper, with an embarrassment of diamonds, gold, cobalt, copper, tin, tantalum, you name it—trillions’ worth of natural resources. But because of never ending war, it is one of the poorest and most traumatized nations in the world. It doesn’t make any sense, until you understand that militia-controlled mines in eastern Congo have been feeding raw materials into the world’s biggest electronics and jewelry companies and at the same time feeding chaos. Turns out your laptop—or camera or gaming system or gold necklace—may have a smidgen of Congo’s pain somewhere in it.

The mine in the Bavi area is a perfect example. It’s controlled by a potbellied warlord called Cobra Matata, though “controlled” may be a strong word. There are no discernible front lines out here marking where government rule definitively ends and Cobra’s territory definitively begins, no opposing troops hunkered down in trenches or foxholes eyeballing each other through their scopes. Instead there are just messy, blurry degrees of influence, often very marginal influence, with a few Congolese government guys lounging under a mango tree in one place, and maybe two miles down the road a few of Cobra’s child soldiers smoking pot, and nothing in between but big, vacant, sparkling green wilderness.

“Sigara! Sigara!” the child soldiers yell, seeking cigarettes. Photographer Marcus Bleasdale and I quickly push fistfuls of Sportsmans, a local brand, out the window, and they are instantaneously gobbled up by feverish little hands. That seems to do the trick, along with a few thousand crumpled Congolese francs, worth less than five bucks, and then we’re on our way again, rumbling down an excruciatingly bumpy dirt road, past thatched-roof villages and banana trees. In the distance giant mountains nose the sky.

When we get to Bavi, we sit down with the village elders and talk gold. The world gold price has quadrupled over the past ten years, but there’s no sign of development or newfound prosperity out here. Bavi has the same broken-down feel of any other village in eastern Congo: a clump of round huts hunched by the road, a market where the shops are made of sticks, shopkeepers torpidly selling heaps of secondhand clothes, and glassy-eyed men reeking of home brew stumbling down the dirt footpaths. There’s no electricity or running water, and the elders say they need medicine and books for the school. The kids are barefoot, their bellies pushed out like balloons from malnutrition or worms or both.

“We’re broke,” says Juma Mafu, one of the elders. “We’ve got a lot of gold but no machines to get it out. Our diggers use their hands. No big companies are ever going to come here unless we have peace.” Which they clearly don’t.

The birds are chirping, and the afternoon sun is slanting behind us as we walk down the hill toward the gold mine. First stop is to say hello to the “minister of mines,” who is at a pub in the market, sitting Buddha-like with his eyes half closed behind a forest of freshly polished-off Primus beer bottles. He is an enormous man and wears a cheap, silvery blazer stretched awkwardly over the thick rolls of fat on his back.
  
“Hujambo, mzee,” I say, giving him a respectful Swahili greeting.

He burps—loudly. I tell him we’re journalists and we’d like to see the gold mine.

He laughs a nasty little laugh and then says, “How do I know you’re journalists? Maybe you’re spies.” The word “spies” shoots through the market like a spark, igniting a crowd of people, who suddenly flock around us. A one-eyed child soldier glares at us menacingly and fingers his gun. Another young man abruptly announces that he works for the Congolese government intelligence service and wants to see our documents.

Time to leave, I think. Time to leave, right now. As casually as I can manage at this point, though my voice is beginning to crack, I say, “Fine ... uh ... no problem. Then we’ll just ... um ... go home.”

But the minister of mines shakes his fat head. “No, no, you won’t. You’re under arrest.”

“For what?” I ask, my throat parched.

“For being in a zone rouge.

Isn’t most of eastern Congo a red zone, controlled by armed groups? I think. But I don’t say anything, because the next minute we’re marched into a car for a five-hour drive to the larger town of Bunia, where we will be held at gunpoint and interrogated in a dark, little house with mysterious stains on the floor.

The story of Congo is this: The government in Kinshasa, the capital, is weak and corrupt, leaving this vast nation rotten at its core. The remote east has plunged straight into anarchy, carved up by a hodgepodge of rebel groups that help bankroll their brutality with stolen minerals. The government army is often just as sticky fingered and wicked. Few people in recent memory have suffered as long, and on such a horrifying scale, as the Congolese. Where else are men, women, and children slaughtered by the hundreds, year after year, sometimes so deep in the jungle that it takes weeks for the truth to come out? Where else are hundreds of thousands of women raped and just about nobody punished?

To appreciate how Congo descended into this madness, you need to step back more than a hundred years to when King Leopold II of Belgium snatched this huge space in the middle of Africa as his own personal colony. Leopold wanted rubber and ivory, and he started the voracious wholesale assault on Congo’s resources that has dragged on to this day. When the Belgians abruptly granted Congo independence in 1960, insurrections erupted immediately, paving the way for an ambitious young military man, Mobutu Sese Seko, to seize power—and never let go. Mobutu ruled for 32 years, stuffing himself with fresh Parisian cake airlifted into his jungle palaces while Congolese children curled up and starved.

But Mobutu would eventually go down, and when he did, Congo would go down with him. In 1994 Rwanda, next door, imploded in genocide, leaving up to a million dead. Many of the killers fled into eastern Congo, which became a base for destabilizing Rwanda. So Rwanda teamed up with neighboring Uganda and invaded Congo, ousting Mobutu in 1997 and installing their own proxy, Laurent Kabila. They soon grew annoyed with him and invaded again. That second phase of Congo’s war sucked in Chad, Namibia, Angola, Burundi, Sudan, and Zimbabwe—it’s often called Africa’s first world war.

In the ensuing free-for-all, foreign troops and rebel groups seized hundreds of mines. It was like giving an ATM card to a drugged-out kid with a gun. The rebels funded their brutality with diamonds, gold, tin, and tantalum, a hard, gray, corrosion-resistant element used to make electronics. Eastern Congo produces 20 to 50 percent of the world’s tantalum.

Under intense international pressure in the early 2000s, the foreign armies officially withdrew, leaving Congo in ruins. Bridges, roads, houses, schools, and entire families had been destroyed. As many as five million Congolese had died. Peace conferences were hosted, but cordial meetings in fancy hotels didn’t alter the ugly facts on the ground. The United Nations sent in thousands of military peacekeepers—there are around 17,000 today—but the blood continued to flow. Donor nations sank $500 million into an election in 2006—Congo’s first truly inclusive one—but that didn’t change things either.

Congo’s east remained a battle zone. Ugandans, Rwandans, and Burundians kept sneaking across the borders to sponsor various rebel outfits, which kept using minerals to buy more weapons and pay more rebels, like the wig-wearing Cobra Matata boys. Despite the international outcry, no one knew exactly what to do.

Sometime around 2008 a critical mass of human rights groups and American lawmakers started asking a crucial question: What about the minerals? What if Congo’s mineral trade could be cleaned up and the rebel ATM shut down? A “blood diamonds” campaign in the late 1990s had exposed how the West African diamond trade was funding rebellions on that side of Africa. What about a similar conflict-minerals campaign for Congo?

On July 21, 2010, President Barack Obama signed the Dodd-Frank financial-reform bill, an 848-page behemoth that included a special section on conflict minerals. The law called for publicly listed American companies to disclose whether any of their products included minerals from mines controlled by armed groups in or around Congo. Though Dodd-Frank did not explicitly ban corporations from using Congo’s conflict minerals, it made big companies worry about being linked with what is arguably the world’s worst humanitarian disaster.

Even before the legislation was enacted, some leading electronics companies such as Intel, Motorola, and HP had begun tracking the minerals used in their products. Since the law went into effect, many other companies, but not all, have also made progress auditing their supply chains, according to the Enough Project, an American nonprofit that ranks major company efforts to create a clean minerals trade.

Chuck Mulloy of Intel concedes that complying with the new regulations eats into profits (he won’t estimate how much), but “we don’t want to support people who are raping, pillaging, and killing. It’s as simple as that.” By the end of 2012 Intel’s microprocessors were conflict free for tantalum, though the company cannot guarantee that a dash of other conflict minerals, like gold, tin, or tungsten, hasn’t made it into their microchips.

One of the criticisms of Dodd-Frank was that it might prompt electronics companies to simply boycott all minerals from Congo, which would inadvertently hurt local miners’ livelihoods. And this did happen, at least at first. Multinationals stopped buying tin and tantalum ore from smelters unable to prove that their minerals did not fund conflict. And in September 2010 the Congolese government issued a six-month ban on all mining and trading activities in the east—devastating thousands of miners.

But then the first green shoots of a reformed mining trade began to emerge. Congolese authorities started inspecting mines. The army kicked out the militias and rogue soldiers and sent in newly trained mining police to monitor the sites. Armed groups that were trading in tin, tantalum, and tungsten saw their profits drop by 65 percent. Congo’s mines were starting to clean up.

We visited one “green,” or conflict-free, mine, in Nyabibwe, a mining center that stretches for miles in a valley not far from Lake Kivu. The mountainside was crawling with young, hulking men wearing rags and headlamps, hammering, digging, shoveling, scooping, scraping, and hauling away every possible speck of yellowish cassiterite rock, or tin ore. Their cheeks bulged with chunks of sugarcane for energy. It was an antlike army expending millions of calories and gallons of sweat to feed a vast and distant global industry. None of the men knew much about Dodd-Frank, and when asked about the regulations, most grumbled that the price of cassiterite was still too low.

In Nyabibwe all of the easy-to-reach cassiterite was dug up long ago, so today’s miners must bore deep into the mountain, using only hammers and shovels. Inside one tunnel, named Maternity, the mother tunnel, the walls were moist and slimy and narrower at each step. In the thick darkness there was no sense of up or down, just the drip, drip, drip of water and the faint sound of men singing from deep in the bowels of the Earth.

The miners lug the sacks of cassiterite out of the tunnels on their backs and drag them down to a little hut at the bottom of the mountain, where clerks weigh them, record the numbers in a big book, and affix a plastic bar-code tag indicating that this cassiterite is conflict free. Then onward by motorbike or pickup to Bukavu, the main town, to be loaded onto tractor trailers bound for Rwanda and then to Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, a big port on the Indian Ocean. The cassiterite ends up in Malaysia, where it is smelted at more than 2,200 degrees Fahrenheit and then sold to electronics companies.

The Nyabibwe mine used to be run by Congolese soldiers. But in 2011 the government ordered the military out. Since then, reports indicate that military-led smuggling may still be going on at the mine. But when we were there, in January of this year, we didn’t see any soldiers, militiamen, or child laborers. The record books looked pretty clean. Nyabibwe seemed like progress.

The problem is that there are still too few clean mines. Only about 10 percent of mines in the east—55 in total—have been deemed conflict free. Although most tin, tantalum, and tungsten mines have been demilitarized, gold mines remain largely in army or rebel hands. Government officials collude secretly with rebel chiefs like Cobra Matata to make money, as we learned when we tried to get to the Bavi gold mine.

After our arrest, soldiers interrogated us in the small, dark house in Bunia for hours: “Who took you to Bavi? What was the purpose of your trip? Where did you go?” they shouted.

We were confused. We knew Bavi was rebel controlled. We’d seen all those rebel child soldiers there with our own eyes. So why did a government intelligence officer have us arrested? Wasn’t the government supposed to be fighting the rebels? When we were released, security agents tailed us and slept in a car outside our hotel.

“You stumbled into a game,” explained a United Nations official with years of experience in Congo. “They are all sharing the illegal spoils. It’s a scramble. It’s grab as much as you can.”

He pointed to the recent scandal of Gen. Gabriel Amisi, Congo’s land-forces commander, who was suspended after UN investigators revealed that he was covertly arming brutal rebel groups, selling them weapons and ammunition that helped them poach elephants for ivory. All this while he was ostensibly fighting the same rebels. A game indeed. A double game.

“The government is crumbling, and everybody is trying to do a deal and cut Kinshasa out,” the UN official said. “Those guys in Bavi didn’t want you seeing what they were up to.”

When we asked him what it would take to fix Congo, he looked down at his polished shoes for a long time. “There’s no easy solution,” he said. “And I’m not even sure there is any solution.”

The next day we flew out of Bunia in a small prop plane. Below us, the banana trees faded into dark green swirls and the thatched-roof villages turned into tiny brown dots as we crossed over the same beautifully sculpted mountains where all that treasure lay buried.


_____________________________________________________________________
Respond to the following questions in the comment box below:

1. What was your reaction to this article?  What surprised/ shocked you the most? Why?
2. Why is the Democratic Republic of Congo so poor despite its mineral wealth?
3. What do you think can and should be done to help solve this problem? How can you help? 

You are responsible for defining all vocabulary words (underlined).  You should include synonyms with your definition.  

16 comments:

  1. 1. I am very surprised by this article. This surprises me because I did not know anything like this was happening in the world. I never knew there were countries struggling because militiamen and rebels were creating conflicts, with the government knowing what is going on! What surprised me the most was that large electronic companies are using the illegal products, some without even knowing it.
    2. The Democratic Republic of Congo is so poor, despite its mineral wealth, because militiamen, rebel armies, and foreign armies have controlled most of the mines there, and are illegally selling their products to other countries. Congo is not making any profit from them.
    3. The government can interfere and try to solve this problem. They can use force and ask for clear documentation for all of their exports. The government can also force any foreigners to leave the country. I can help this issue by raising awareness of what is going on in Congo and spreading the word to other people. Hopefully, this will create a chain reaction and get attention from important officials.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was most surprised and shocked by the way that the government officials in Congo were dealing with illegal rebel-controlled mines to make money. This creates an impression to residents in Congo and other nations around the world that Congo is a weak, powerless, and desperate country that is vulnerable to anything. When an independent nation is in this poor of a state, it is usually the government's job to lift the country even if it is by the scruff of the neck.Instead, Congo is demonstrating that it s not capable of running as an independent nation by the corrupt government.
    The corrupt government is very much a part of why the Democratic Republic of Congo is so poor. For example, the government is allowing rebel groups to illegally "control" mines like seen with the Bavi mines. As noted by a United Nations official, "They are all sharing the illegal spoils. It's a scramble. It's grab as much as you can" (qtd. in Getttleman). Therefore, instead of putting a stop to the illegal selling of the precious minerals, the government is using it to make money for themselves, which leads to no profit or gain for the entire nation of Congo.
    I think it is time to realize that the government of Congo will never begin to control the exports and use of mines by themselves. It is up to the United Nations and powerful countries like the United States to enforce what should be done. Sending some military support can help enforce much needed reform and advisers can also be sent to provide help and support to a weak Congo government. Slowly, the country will get to its feet and to a point where it can function fruitfully without foreign aid. I can help with the difficulties in Congo by creating a creative fundraiser. It can start in the school and slowly expand to the outside community and even the town or county. By fundraising for the Congo cause, it will not only help introduce awareness of the issue but also raise money to begin building schools in Congo. Without at least a standard education, what good is reform to the general public? All in all, a lot can be done to help an unfortunate nation and both the President and I can help the cause.

    ReplyDelete
  3. After reading this article, I am frustrated with the concept of this issue. It seems like there are far too many problems working against the Democratic Republic of the Congo, especially its eastern areas, for it to easily become organized and wealthier in the near future. What shocked me most of all was how, despite being extremely rich in minerals, Congo is still a poor nation due to the shortage of companies wanting to provide the diggers with machines because of its lack of peace. This surprised me due to the fact that those who are facilitating the issues, such as the warlord influencing the mine in the Bavi area, Cobra Matata, would likely be richer and more powerful if they allowed Congo to become peaceful and prosperous, as then they could mine minerals more efficiently, as companies would be more willing to help them, thereby making more money for those in Congo. The Democratic Republic of Congo is disproportionately poor despite its mineral wealth because, as previously stated, it is an area of great conflict. Companies do not wish to go there to assist in mining due to the high safety risks and unrest. Also, worries about being linked to conflict mines in the Congo, as is now required to be disclaimed according to the Dodd-Frank bill, caused many companies to refuse to buy minerals from Congo (at least when the bill began), harming the mining economy in Congo further. While I do not believe that there is any fast and immediate solution to the issue in Congo, I believe to solve this problem the government must take back the mines from rebels and warlords by force, such as by using the army. This would be the most direct way to take back the treasure hoard beneath Congo, and likely one of the most effective (especially if warlords were imprisoned or exiled, decreasing the likelihood of the same issue occurring). Also, the government itself needs to be reformed and strengthened. A more controlling, organized government uniting all of the mines and lands in Congo would allow Congo to become more peaceful and make real progress towards being the wealthy nation it in theory should be. Other countries should be requested for help as well in order to take back the mines (which provide them with the minerals in their electronics) as well as sustain order until Congo can stand on its own once more. In order to help, I can perform simple actions like spreading awareness of this crisis, as this would allow more people to understand the situation, increasing the world’s ability to respond to it and improve the situation. In doing so, Congo may be a better place in the future, drastically improving the quality of life for those living there by bettering its economy in the long run.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This article was very awakening for me, because I was under the impression that scandals and injustice on this scale only occurred in the middle east now a days. It is shocking that Congo's government cannot fix this ongoing issue, and they do not really seem to be trying that hard either. The only reason that a small portion of the mines have cleaned up their act is because of US intervention, not because the Congolese government has taken any action. I was also shocked by the fact that the very minerals in our electronic devices that we so heavily rely on are coming from such a messed up situation. How many people starved to death in the Congo because the money from the materials in your phone went to warlords controlling the mines instead of to the government, who could in turn help the general public? The Democratic Republic of Congo is so poor despite it's mineral wealth because the majority of mines are controlled by warlords who get all the money for themselves, instead of the money going to the government. The warlords are rich enough to be overweight, while the rest of the country dies of malnutrition. Even the money that does go to the government is not being used in the way it should, because the government is really no better than the warlords. After the first African World War, the whole country was immersed in complete chaos, with anybody seizing control of whatever mines they could get, including Burundians, Ugandans, and Rwandans. The latter groups continue to sneak over the border to participate in the corrupt system of mining in the Congo. There does not seem to be any clear cut solution for the multiple problems of Congo, but the first step is to install a serious government. This was supposedly accomplished in 2006, but it has accomplished little. The Congo needs a serious leader that can seize control of the mines and steer the country in a better direction. The United Nations will have to step in, because the Congo looks to be incapable of accomplishing anything by itself. The US has already signed the Dodd-Frank bill that stated that companies must specify whether their products contained minerals from the mines under illegal control in the Congo. This has led to some mines cleaning up their act, but it really has not done enough to fix the entire industry. I would hope that things could be worked out diplomatically, but force may be needed eventually. I can help by spreading awareness about the problem, because the majority of people do not know that this is going on. One step that could be taken is to not purchase products containing any conflict minerals, but that is next to impossible these days.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Why? It is a question everyone should ask themselves before doing anything. If one can answer in a clear cut way no hesitation and have an explanation, then it is fine, but when the explanation is untold or not able to be figured out then why do the action. Truly, why move into a country to escape a your own. You are not going to go to the center, you are going to end up close to the border where you can still be found. Your original country can still invade for you and you are not far away enough to escape. War is something that moves the hands of time so I am not surprised with the start of the war in Congo. What I am surprised about is how there is no stability. In America it seems everything is organized. The path differ ever so slightly, such as what school one goes and little things, but here you are held at gunpoint to work. Schools destroyed and with war still in the country the schools are not being rebuilt, and people just get arrested for asking for a tour? Even with help from the military the country still is not able to get organized. The republic is poor despite mineral wealth because there is constant war. Arming rebels with the money from the minerals. Some people even stealing minerals. The minerals are wealth but the people of country are being stupid by not using the mineral money to rebuild but instead use the minerals for war. Solve the problem,give the people a lesson. Show them how other countries are run. The people need to learn that what they are doing is not only affecting their economic wealth but the world, because no company, no matter how desperate, will ever go into a war zone to mine. Find a way to make peace with your neighbors or do not let them go into your country. It is your country and your minerals not theirs. Make a strong border control and with less rebels groups forming the country can start to rebuild. Then and only then will Congo get anywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Even though this article was indeed appalling, I expected Congo to be like this. The continent of Africa is infected with the poor, and poverty is an issue that is unlikely to be solved in today's society. Congo is deep with Africa, which further leads to my expectation of Congo having these complications. Be that as it may, I was still shocked by the fact by how children play a major role in the issues that exist today. Their images disturb me very much as the sight of uneducated, ruthless, and malevolent kids are the products of an insubstantial government. The Democratic Republic of Congo is extremely rich in the minerals and gold that anyone can dream of, yet they remain poverty-stricken. Conflicts and wars still rage throughout Congo, as the army and the rebel forces are stuck in combat. They all desire these mines, and they will do anything it takes to achieve in seizing the valuables. As our companies use these minerals to fuel their business, warlords in Congo feed off the profits and gain more power. They can acquire more troops of all ages and increase their weight at the same time their riches keep piling upon each other. President Barack Obama enacted the Dood-Frank financial-reform bill, where American companies are no longer able to incorporate minerals into their products that were bought from mines in Congo. Even donations were made in order to begin an election to occur during 2006 in Congo. Be that as it may, nothing worked perfectly. Many still fought, and innocents were killed. Miners could not make profits anymore, as the Dood -Frank bill put them out of business. The Government and the rebels are even rumored to be working together, where a United Nations official stated, "They are all sharing the illegal spoils. It's a scramble. It's a grab as much as you can" (Gettleman 1). Simply put, it is like Deal or No Deal. You take what I offer and give me what I request, or else.
    Even though I wish I was able to assist the Democratic Republic of Congo, we, the common people, can only watch this event unfold. We have no power in changing their future, and even with our donations, as seen in 2006, they prove to be little to no use. Be that as it may, the superpowers within this world have the capability to make a significant difference. The United Nations and China should work cooperatively and eradicate the ones who are guilty of their crimes. Not only that, the world must work together to recover not only Congo, but the entire continent of Africa. Completing this goal will add another potential superpower that will work towards a safe and peaceful world, and the people of Africa would finally seek the harmony they desired for such a long time.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The first emotion that struck me while reading this article was surprise as I had not expected the Republic of Congo to be such a war-torn country where even large companies such as Intel take advantage of the Republic of Congo's valuable resources products. The second emotion that struck me while I was reading the article was one of confusion. I didn't understand why the government officials would deal with the rebels when they had the resources to put an end to all the rebellions that were occurring throughout the poverty-stricken country.Despite the fruitful abundance of gold and other valuable minerals in the Republic of Congo, many of the people are destitute because of continuous war throughout the country with rebels and the government fighting over control over the mines for their own personal agendas. The government of the Republic of Congo and its capital Kinshasa, are weak and corrupt.
    To stop the looming threat of the rebel groups, the world should send troops to the Republic of Congo to maintain order and then reform the government to rid it of the corrupted officials. The troops that other countries contribute will help stop the rebel groups from taking advantage of the resources of the mine and making profits for themselves rather than the country as a whole. However, unlike past efforts, other countries should send limited troops as to avoid each country from suddenly trying to seize the mines for their own purposes. However, we can also help by buying less and less of products made of gold and other valuable minerals as to ensure that people in the Republic of Congo are not forced to work as hard and no other companies are participating in "unclean" trade for the minerals needed to make their products. People could also just completely boycott all goods that are related to minerals from the Republic of Congo altogether in order to stop the rebel groups from making illegal profits.
    Another way to stop the distress in The Republic of Congo is by setting up charities and donations to stop the fighting and corruption that is taking the lives of many throughout Congo. Direct support is an option, but it is not needed as donations can perfectly support the poverty-stricken country and will provide the citizens with some resources to improve their lives.

    ReplyDelete
  8. . This article, while quite alarming, seemed to line up with some belief I had before reading this article. I’ve heard a lot about civil wars and lots of fighting and even genocide in Africa, so reading about these atrocities in Congo almost seem blasé to me. This apathy from myself is probably the most alarming thing that I got out of this article. All of these terrible things, such as, but not limited to, child soldiers, rebel fighting groups, corrupt government, land snatching Belgians, and mass rape had an unusually small reaction from me. I guess most of it was from the surprise that such a minimally rich nation can be so economically poor.
    . It is quite obvious to me that the Republic of Congo is poor due to the dangers that the land poses. The economic opportunity is there, but no enterprising businessman is going to bring in technology and manpower necessary to make Congo rich with the threat of rebel groups everywhere. This is not to mention the fact that getting the minerals gets harder with every passing year. The miners use hammers and shovels to get minerals from deep inside the mineral mountain mines. The last time anyone used picks and shovels to mine in the western world coincidentally coincides with the invention of any other method, and no one is going to be importing the necessary materials for upgrading the mining operations any time soon.
    . Obviously, the answer is not to be just feeding all of the terrible mines equipment. That would never help. I doubt a full scale military response would help much either, though. No one would want to participate in that. As stated in the article, boycotting the Congo would not be helping either. The only ones who would suffer are the poor miners. What really needs to happen is for some type of minimum wage to be established and some business incentive to have businesses go in and try to have a successful mining operation. If some government or military would provide protection, I’m sure that businesses would start to pop up, and if there was a minimum wage, the workers might be treated better than where they are now.

    ReplyDelete
  9. 1. My reaction to this article is like most people I had no idea this was even happening. I get to caught up in my own life to normally think about other countries and the countless struggles they are going through, which are way worse than mine. It is extremely sad and irritating to think that these militia groups would do this to their own country's people. I think what really surprised me the most was that the government was in on the scam also. Although the government should be helping the people, they are doing the exact opposite and only thinking about themselves and what they can get. It is a shame that the people of the Congo can not rely on their own government to make smart choices and help them as a nation. This shocked me the most because as a government you should be for the people and put other people first. I realize that many people do not do that even in first world countries, but our government acts like they care about us. In the Congo the government is only in on it to get a 'piece of the pie'.
    2. The Democratic Republic of Congo is very poor not only because of war but because there is no stability in their government. They also are not handling business correctly. They should not be selling the resources to electronic companies for so little and not getting a whole lot in return. Also they have no government that is for the people. All the government wants is money and to make a deal with the miners to get something. Another reason why they are so poor is because the people of the Congo have no relation. They constantly fight and bicker over little things that do not matter, when their country is wasting away. Although other countries have stepped in to help, the Democratic Republic of the Congo needs to have more unity within themselves to accomplish what they want and get a strong nation back.
    3. I think what can be done is that we should stop buying from companies who use the Congo's electronic material for their electronics. The Congo's income may go down, but it will provide them with the opportunity to rebuild their nation while having valuable resources. I think that what we can do is not buy from companies that use the Congo's resources. I think that the other nations around the Democratic Republic of the Congo can also step in to help,Rwanda for instance, instead of bringing in people to fight they can help the Congo's government to reestablish some sort of order into the daily lives of those who work in the mines. Also I feel that those in the mines do not get enough nutrition. The workers run on sugar which is extremely unhealthy because they are working so much. Another thing I think could change is that the workers should have some help. They should update the mines so that the miners could be safer as they work and want to work to provide for their families. That brings me to another point, if the workers are not being paid well, then why do they bother going to work. Probably because the militias force them too. I think that a lot can be done to help the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 1. This article was incredible to me. I was amazed at the level of conflict in the Congo. If there are young teenagers with assault rifles threatening one for cigarettes, you know there is a problem and that something needs to be done about it. Also, if one gets arrested for asking about the price of gold, there is something wrong. However, that isn't even what surprised me the most. What made me most shocked was the fact that the government of the Congo hasn't done anything about it. The only country that has done something, in fact, is the United States of America, on the opposite side of the world. This is when you know there is a corrupted government. Something has to be done about this horrid government, and it needs to be done fast.
    2. The Congo is so poor despite its mineral wealth because of the terrible government they have. They have no sense of business; they are selling the minerals for so much less than they are worth. The country is an ongoing war zone, and the government is as well. Also, even though the actual country is so rich in minerals, they have no way to extract these minerals. They have no big machines or anything close to that; they have their hands and they have little shovels; that's it. Therefore, despite the trillions of dollars worth of precious metals they have, they are absolutely and utterly broke.
    3. At this point, the government is so corrupted that it would take a lot of effort to right it. I would say to stop buying minerals from the Congo, but that would hurt thousands of miners. If we simply boycotted the minerals from the Congo, the little pay the miners are receiving now would be reduced to none. However, I think that there may be one temporary solution. If we provide the Congo with the machines they need to extract the minerals, even just for a little while, it would be enough to let them extract enough to make some profit off of it. It would be difficult to get it over there, but I think that it could really help.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. if we just supply them with what they need, they'll get out of it without punishment for what they forced people to go through.

      Delete
  11. I was completely shocked while reading "The Pain of Precious" by Jeffrey Gettleman. I was surprised at myself and the American media, for I had never heard of this conflict in the Congo. I was especially shocked that us here in America could be feeding into the issue by buying products containing conflict minerals that fund muderous rebel groups. I could not get it out of my head that the very iPad I am typing on may contain "a smidgen of Congo's pain somewhere in it." I immediately looked it up and was relieved that only four out of 201 of Apple's mineral suppliers were not cleared as non-conflict, and after much research, Apple believes that they are not funding rebel groups. Despite all the natural wealth in the Congo, it is because of these groups that the country continues to be so poor. Instead of the money going to the people it goes to the groups that pay back the Congo with murder, rape and pillaging. Currently, most companies are trying their best to not buy from conflict mines, however, it is still not against the law to do so. By making it unlawful to support rebel groups in the Congo, it would prevent them from gaining power and doing more damage to the country. Sure, electronics and gold may be a tad more expensive, but it would be worth the lives saved. At the current moment, since there is no law, I can help the situation by making sure all the jewlery and electronics I purchase are not involved with the conflict. I can also educate people about the issue, so that maybe they, too, will do their part.

    ReplyDelete
  12. i. I was surprised about how horribly people treat others and how they can get away with it for a while. It's hard to believe that no one has stopped them considering how quickly people get stopped and punished for stupid, harmless things.
    ii. The Democratic Republic of Congo is poor despite its mineral wealth because the people do not get to keep the money they work hard to earn. Instead, the money goes to other countries who already have plenty of money.
    iii. One way we can help to solve this problem is to stop giving them a reason to mine the minerals. That is, stop buying the products that have the minerals in them. However, this will be difficult to convince people to do because we all are very dependent on our electronic devices. To convince people, we need to let them know how harmful and terrible the conditions are for the miners who get these minerals. I personally can help spread the word about the harm it causes and its severity.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Firstly, it surprises me how harsh the civilians were to the reporters, calling them spies and causing them to be interrogated. But it is understandable that they would take such actions because of the former problems with the government and the endless war that has been occurring. Also, even though there are massive groups 14/15 year old “soldiers” carrying guns and drugs in Congo, this does not surprise me. All over the world there are people as young doing worse things, which is quite morbid. Although, the fact that there is a war going on in one of the most resourceful places in the world, bewilders me. Secondly, the Democratic Republic of Congo is poor even though it has an abundance of minerals because of the war. An elder says “We've got a lot of gold but no machines to get it out. Our diggers use their hands. No big companies are ever going to come here unless we have peace.” So, they are as poor as they are due to the violence that is taking place in Congo. If the violence ceases, then there is a great chance of recovery for this country, but it is very unlikely for the war to stop. Lastly, I can help solve this problem by creating awareness. I could make Social Media accounts spreading the actions being taken in Congo. Also, I could create a website as well, which could let you donate to the cause.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I was actually very happy to read this article because just the other day I was watching a vlogbrothers video about the Central African Republic which is just north of the Congo. John Green focused on the unrest and the complicated struggle for power. Despite, having background knowledge on the Congo, I was so surprised to learn about how "rich" they are even with the title of one of the poorest countries in the world. Of course, the whole idea of using this very computer and wearing this very watch adds a little bit more perspective now. To me, it is no surprise that the government is corrupt and self-serving. This seems to be the norm in poverty-stricken developing countries. What is surprising is the attitudes about it here in the UN. One UN official was unsure if there was even a solution. That attitude will certainly not solve any of the country's complex problems. The Republic of Congo is described as "one of the richest countries on paper" but because of the constant conflict and the corrupt government. Once rebel groups seize control of the mines, they gain the profit leading to their expansion and no economic growth for the country. Only 10% of mines are officially conflict free. In terms of what can be done to help solve this problem, the government in the Congo needs to intervene and crack down on violent rebel groups that violate human rights. The United States should remain neutral and act as a peacekeeping presence. As individuals we can have drives for toiletries and food for the poor in the Congo. Also, advocacy is the key to disabling rebel groups. Many people do not know about the conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo. With more people aware, we can end the purchasing of conflict-minerals and resources to cut money flow to rebels. In addition, American media needs to start reporting on this more so people see this as a priory in worldly affairs.

    ReplyDelete

Email response to me (include block # in subject line) and then post it below as an anonymous comment.